Descubra a raridade que existe em você

Descubra a raridade que existe em você

Quero fazer parte

A woman standing among tall flowering cacti under a deep blue sky, lit by warm late afternoon sun.

Preciosa Club é a comunidade de apoio para mulheres cristãs mulheres cristãs que desejam se libertar da comparação, da culpa e da vergonha, e assumir o seu valor diante do Pai.

Made for the writing you already do

Made for the writing you already do

Made for the writing
you already do

A woman among flowering cacti, looking directly at the camera.

Substack

Unique newsletters. Repurposed notes. Brainstorming interesting subjects.

A young man among flowering cacti, looking directly at the camera.

Instagram / Facebook

Scroll-stopping hooks. Faster and more consistent posting in your tone.

Everything to
preserve human craft

Everything to
preserve human craft

A woman among flowering cacti in warm sunlight, looking away from the camera.

Think clearer, more human

Our prompts open your mind and create clarity, so more of your human side shows in everything you write.

Notify me

A woman among flowering cacti in warm sunlight, looking away from the camera.

Think clearer, more human

Our prompts open your mind and create clarity, so more of your human side shows in everything you write.

Notify me

A man among tall flowering cacti, lit by low warm sun.

Faster from idea to draft

Everything you need is there from the start, so drafts come together faster and with far less frustration.

Notify me

A man among tall flowering cacti, lit by low warm sun.

Faster from idea to draft

Everything you need is there from the start, so drafts come together faster and with far less frustration.

Notify me

A man standing among flowering cacti with his eyes closed, face turned toward the sun.

Grow 45% faster, proven

Creators using our prompts grow up to 45% faster, because their content stays consistent, unique, and on target.

Notify me

A man standing among flowering cacti with his eyes closed, face turned toward the sun.

Grow 45% faster, proven

Creators using our prompts grow up to 45% faster, because their content stays consistent, unique, and on target.

Notify me

Like no other tool, Feel the difference.

Like no other tool, Feel the difference.

Like no other tool.
Feel the difference.

Standard AI

At the beginning of the year, a new idea began to take shape. Driven by ambition, curiosity, and a desire to build something meaningful, one person decided to start a web agency. There was no perfect plan, only a clear sense that it was time to move forward. With a laptop, a simple vision, and the willingness to learn along the way, the first steps were taken. What started as a small decision soon felt like the beginning of something much bigger, full of new possibilities.


Vague, no depth, too general. Polished, but it could be written by anyone.

Hedvig

The plan felt solid at the time. My family was supportive, they said that if anyone could pull this off it was me. I’ve been a frontend developer since 2022. AI had made building websites way faster than it used to be. There are only 2-3 other web agencies where I live, all of them honestly a bit outdated. Mostly old WordPress builds without AI adoption. Local roots seemed like an advantage. I’d be the guy in town who makes modern websites. Easy.


Your tone, your feelings, your experiences. Readers instantly resonate with your writing.

A dusk sky in deep blue, scattered with small clouds catching the last warm light.

Try before you spend a single penny

Try before you
spend a single penny

Get full access

Notify me

A woman with long auburn hair standing in a field of pink blossoms, with soft hills behind her.

Voice fingerprint

Here are three things I’ve written: [paste]. Don’t comment on quality. Reverse-engineer the rules my writing already follows and return them as a reusable card with five sections: sentence rhythm (typical length, where I break it, how I open paragraphs), punctuation habits (what I overuse, what I never touch), recurring hedges and filler I use on purpose, the moves I never make, and five words or constructions that appear in all three pieces. Quote one real example from my text under every rule. Where two pieces contradict each other, say so instead of averaging them out. End with the three rules that would break my voice fastest if violated.

The questions after the questions

I want to write about [topic]. Interview me in three rounds and write nothing until I say go. Round one: five questions about what happened, plain facts, no interpretation. Wait for my answers. Round two: five questions that follow the thread I gave least detail on — go where I was vague, not where I was fluent. Wait. Round three: three questions about what I still haven’t said, including the part I’d be uncomfortable publishing. After each round, tell me in one line which answer holds the most usable material and why. If an answer of mine sounds like something I’ve read somewhere, say so and ask again.

Flinch finder

Read this draft: [paste]. Find every place where I got abstract right at the point it turned personal — general statements, borrowed phrasing, sudden shifts to “you” or “we”, passive constructions around the part that cost me something. For each one: quote the sentence, name what I likely skipped over, and ask me the question that would get the real version out. Don’t fix anything and don’t offer replacement lines. Rank the findings by how much the piece would improve if I answered honestly. If you find nothing, say the draft is already exposed and stop.

Attention drop map

First, build a profile of my likely reader from this draft: [paste]. Tell me what you assume about their patience, what they already know, and what would make them close the tab. Ask me to confirm or correct it before continuing. Then read the draft as that person, paragraph by paragraph, and mark every point where their attention drops — with the reason: too slow, already knew this, don’t believe it, lost the thread, don’t care yet. Give me a running list in order, not a summary. Then name the single paragraph carrying the most weight for that reader, and the paragraph they’d never miss if it disappeared.

Reverse outline

Read this draft: [paste] and extract the outline that actually exists, not the one I intended. One line per paragraph, in my own words where possible, stating what that paragraph does — sets up, argues, illustrates, digresses, repeats, lands. Then answer four questions plainly: what is the piece actually about, where does the real opening sentence sit, which paragraph is the buried point, and which two paragraphs are making the same move twice. Finish with the order the paragraphs would need to be in for the argument to work, listed by number. Don’t rewrite a single sentence.

Archive pattern

Here are eight to ten things I’ve published: [paste titles and text]. Ignore the stated topics. Find what I keep circling back to across all of them — the recurring tension, the enemy I keep naming, the thing I defend without being asked. Show me the evidence: quote the line from each piece where the pattern surfaces. Then tell me what this makes my actual subject, in one sentence, phrased the way I’d phrase it. Then name three pieces I haven’t written that sit at the center of that pattern instead of the edge, and say for each one why it’s uncomfortable to write.

  • Voice fingerprint

    Here are three things I’ve written: [paste]. Don’t comment on quality. Reverse-engineer the rules my writing already follows and return them as a reusable card with five sections: sentence rhythm (typical length, where I break it, how I open paragraphs), punctuation habits (what I overuse, what I never touch), recurring hedges and filler I use on purpose, the moves I never make, and five words or constructions that appear in all three pieces. Quote one real example from my text under every rule. Where two pieces contradict each other, say so instead of averaging them out. End with the three rules that would break my voice fastest if violated.

  • The questions after the questions

    I want to write about [topic]. Interview me in three rounds and write nothing until I say go. Round one: five questions about what happened, plain facts, no interpretation. Wait for my answers. Round two: five questions that follow the thread I gave least detail on — go where I was vague, not where I was fluent. Wait. Round three: three questions about what I still haven’t said, including the part I’d be uncomfortable publishing. After each round, tell me in one line which answer holds the most usable material and why. If an answer of mine sounds like something I’ve read somewhere, say so and ask again.

  • Flinch finder

    Read this draft: [paste]. Find every place where I got abstract right at the point it turned personal — general statements, borrowed phrasing, sudden shifts to “you” or “we”, passive constructions around the part that cost me something. For each one: quote the sentence, name what I likely skipped over, and ask me the question that would get the real version out. Don’t fix anything and don’t offer replacement lines. Rank the findings by how much the piece would improve if I answered honestly. If you find nothing, say the draft is already exposed and stop.

  • Attention drop map

    First, build a profile of my likely reader from this draft: [paste]. Tell me what you assume about their patience, what they already know, and what would make them close the tab. Ask me to confirm or correct it before continuing. Then read the draft as that person, paragraph by paragraph, and mark every point where their attention drops — with the reason: too slow, already knew this, don’t believe it, lost the thread, don’t care yet. Give me a running list in order, not a summary. Then name the single paragraph carrying the most weight for that reader, and the paragraph they’d never miss if it disappeared.

  • Reverse outline

    Read this draft: [paste] and extract the outline that actually exists, not the one I intended. One line per paragraph, in my own words where possible, stating what that paragraph does — sets up, argues, illustrates, digresses, repeats, lands. Then answer four questions plainly: what is the piece actually about, where does the real opening sentence sit, which paragraph is the buried point, and which two paragraphs are making the same move twice. Finish with the order the paragraphs would need to be in for the argument to work, listed by number. Don’t rewrite a single sentence.

  • Archive pattern

    Here are eight to ten things I’ve published: [paste titles and text]. Ignore the stated topics. Find what I keep circling back to across all of them — the recurring tension, the enemy I keep naming, the thing I defend without being asked. Show me the evidence: quote the line from each piece where the pattern surfaces. Then tell me what this makes my actual subject, in one sentence, phrased the way I’d phrase it. Then name three pieces I haven’t written that sit at the center of that pattern instead of the edge, and say for each one why it’s uncomfortable to write.

Free to start,
yours to keep.

Free to start,
yours to keep.

Free to start,
yours to keep.

Sample

Six prompts to try, before you decide anything.

Free

forever

Try the prompts

6 of the 21 prompts

Copy and paste, no setup

Works with ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini

No account, no card

Full library

All 21 prompts, including the ones you would not have thought to ask.

$29

once

Get full access

All 21 prompts, every category

Lifetime access, no subscription

New prompts added at no extra cost

Copy-ready for any AI tool

Any questions?
Reach out via Substack.